By: Steven Sullivan
NIV rides the high horse: ”By blocking your attempts to exclude all other voices, the law forces you to address the real issue. ”That’s mendacity of the most odiferous order. First, science isn’t...
View ArticleBy: Nullius in Verba
“All ‘voices’ are not equally worthy of inclusion.” And that’s exactly why you’ve got problems. You don’t try to persuade by winning the argument, you try to persuade by excluding any opposition....
View ArticleBy: Steven Sullivan
Funny, the rhetoric you choose. Now it’s ‘opposition’, and scientists are supposedly trying to exclude ‘any’ of it? As regards teaching evolution, the ’opposition’ trying to legislate its ’voice’...
View ArticleBy: Nullius in Verba
The judge in Dover PA had presentations of arguments from both sides – exactly what I’ve been saying. And as a result, science won.What do you think the judge would have said if the scientists had...
View ArticleBy: Steven Sullivan
NIV, obviously judges do NOT believe *all* voices are worthy of inclusion in *all* venues. Otherwise they would not keep repeatedly thwarting the efforts of creationists to inject religion into science...
View ArticleBy: Steven Sullivan
And I don’t need to remind you, do I, that science is not a court of law? We don’t legislate (yet) what ‘voices’ scientists must listen to. Plenty of people profess to believe in astrology. If a...
View ArticleClik here to view.
By: BBD
Steve Sullivan Thank you. I’ve been waiting for you to come back and say exactly this for what feels like a long time
View ArticleBy: Nullius in Verba
#94/95, You’re missing the point. The very fact that creationists want to inject religion into science class means science teaching is broken. They ought to be begging you not to cover their religion...
View ArticleBy: Steven Sullivan
What a canard. Seriously, all it takes is money and political clout for something to earn a place in a science curriculum, even if it;s only to show by a randomized DBT that it’s a joke? That’s...
View ArticleBy: Steven Sullivan
NIV rides the high horse: ”By blocking your attempts to exclude all other voices, the law forces you to address the real issue. ”That’s mendacity of the most odiferous order. First, science isn’t...
View ArticleBy: Nullius in Verba
“All “˜voices’ are not equally worthy of inclusion.” And that’s exactly why you’ve got problems. You don’t try to persuade by winning the argument, you try to persuade by excluding any opposition....
View ArticleBy: Steven Sullivan
Funny, the rhetoric you choose. Now it’s ‘opposition’, and scientists are supposedly trying to exclude ‘any’ of it? As regards teaching evolution, the ’opposition’ trying to legislate its ’voice’...
View ArticleBy: Nullius in Verba
The judge in Dover PA had presentations of arguments from both sides – exactly what I’ve been saying. And as a result, science won.What do you think the judge would have said if the scientists had...
View ArticleBy: Steven Sullivan
NIV, obviously judges do NOT believe *all* voices are worthy of inclusion in *all* venues. Otherwise they would not keep repeatedly thwarting the efforts of creationists to inject religion into science...
View ArticleBy: Steven Sullivan
And I don’t need to remind you, do I, that science is not a court of law? We don’t legislate (yet) what ‘voices’ scientists must listen to. Plenty of people profess to believe in astrology. If a...
View ArticleClik here to view.
By: BBD
Steve Sullivan Thank you. I’ve been waiting for you to come back and say exactly this for what feels like a long time
View ArticleBy: Nullius in Verba
#94/95, You’re missing the point. The very fact that creationists want to inject religion into science class means science teaching is broken. They ought to be begging you not to cover their religion...
View ArticleBy: Steven Sullivan
What a canard. Seriously, all it takes is money and political clout for something to earn a place in a science curriculum, even if it;s only to show by a randomized DBT that it’s a joke? That’s...
View Article
